Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int J Sports Med. 2013 Apr;34(4):355-63. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1311594. Epub 2012 Nov 23.

Interval training in men at risk for insulin resistance.

Author information

1
Sport, Health and Exercise Science, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom. c.p.earnest@bath.ac.uk

Abstract

We compared 3 months of eucaloric (12 kcal/kg/wk) steady state aerobic training (AER) to interval training (INT) in men at risk for insulin resistance. Primary outcomes included oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) and HOMA-IR 24 h and 72 h after each participants last exercise session. Secondary outcomes were VO2max, anthropometry, and metabolic syndrome expressed as a summed z-score (zMS). We also performed a sub-analysis for participants entering the trial above and below the HOMA-IR study median. Mean (95% CI) AER ( - 12.81 mg/dl; - 24.7, - 1.0) and INT ( - 14.26 mg/dl; - 24.9, - 3.6) significantly improved 24 h OGTT. HOMA-IR did not improve for AER, but did for INT 24 h and 72 h post-exercise. VO2max improved similarly for both groups. Changes in body mass for INT ( - 2.29 kg; - 3.51, - 1.14), AER, ( - 1.32 kg; - 2.62, 0.58)] and percent body fat [INT, - 0.83%; - 1.62, - 0.03), AER ( - 0.17%; - 1.07, 0.06)] were only significant for INT. When examined as a full cohort, zMS improved for both groups. Upon HOMA-IR stratification, only high HOMA-IR AER showed significant improvements, while both low and high INT HOMA-IR participants demonstrated significant reductions (P<0.05). Eucaloric AER and INT appear to affect fasting glucose, OGTT and VO2max similarly, while INT may have a greater impact on HOMA-IR and zMS.

PMID:
23180210
DOI:
10.1055/s-0032-1311594
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York
Loading ...
Support Center