Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2012 Nov;22(11):716-9. doi: 11.2012/JCPSP.716719.

Retention and processing methods of nasal prosthesis.

Author information

1
Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, University of the State of São Paulo, Brazil. goiato@foa.unesp.br

Abstract

Patients with congenital malformations, traumatic or pathological mutilation and maxillofacial developmental disorders can be restored aesthetically and emotionally by the production and use of facial prostheses. The aim of this study was to review the literature about the retention and processing methods of facial prostheses, and discuss their characteristics. A literature review on Medline (PubMed) database was performed by using the keywords "maxillofacial prosthesis, silicone, esin, pigment, cosmetic, prosthetic nose", based on articles published from 1956 to 2010. Several methods of retention, from adhesives to the placement of implants, and different processing methods such as laser, CAD/CAM and rapid prototyping technologies have been reported. There are advantages and disadvantages of each procedure, and none can be classified as better compared to others.

PMID:
23146853
DOI:
11.2012/JCPSP.716719
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Support Center