Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Mar;7(2):135-58. doi: 10.1177/1745691612436694.

"Shift-and-Persist" Strategies: Why Low Socioeconomic Status Isn't Always Bad for Health.

Author information

1
University of British Columbia echen@psych.ubc.ca.
2
University of British Columbia.

Abstract

Some individuals, despite facing recurrent, severe adversities in life such as low socioeconomic status (SES), are nonetheless able to maintain good physical health. This article explores why these individuals deviate from the expected association of low SES and poor health and outlines a "shift-and-persist" model to explain the psychobiological mechanisms involved. This model proposes that, in the midst of adversity, some children find role models who teach them to trust others, better regulate their emotions, and focus on their futures. Over a lifetime, these low-SES children develop an approach to life that prioritizes shifting oneself (accepting stress for what it is and adapting the self through reappraisals) in combination with persisting (enduring life with strength by holding on to meaning and optimism). This combination of shift-and-persist strategies mitigates sympathetic-nervous-system and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical responses to the barrage of stressors that low-SES individuals confront. This tendency vectors individuals off the trajectory to chronic disease by forestalling pathogenic sequelae of stress reactivity, like insulin resistance, high blood pressure, and systemic inflammation. We outline evidence for the model and argue that efforts to identify resilience-promoting processes are important in this economic climate, given limited resources for improving the financial circumstances of disadvantaged individuals.

KEYWORDS:

cardiovascular; health; resilience; socioeconomic status

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center