Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Surg. 2012 Nov;204(5):684-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.01.014.

Long-term results and quality of life in patients treated with hemorrhoidectomy using two different techniques: Ligasure versus transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization.

Author information

1
Multispecialistic Rectal-Perineal Disease Centre, Sacro Cuore, Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy. dr.zampieri@libero.it

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Hemorrhoids are the most frequent anal pathology. We evaluated the results of 2 techniques at 1 year after surgery.

METHODS:

The clinical charts and data of patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy between January 2008 and June 2010 were considered and analyzed. Patients underwent surgery with 2 techniques: transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) hemorrhoidectomy or LigaSure-vessel sealing system (Valleylab, Boulder, CO). Patients were chosen randomly to receive one technique or the other. The primary objectives were quality of life, quality of defecation, and regression of symptoms.

RESULTS:

Forty-six patients treated with THD and 68 patients treated with Ligasure were enrolled in the study. No significant differences were observed in the rate of postoperative surgical complications or readmissions. Short- and medium-term (1-6 mo) results showed that THD patients had a higher rate of pain resolution compared with Ligasure patients (P < .05). Functionally, all patients treated with Ligasure showed more postoperative constipation despite administration of laxatives than patients treated with THD.

CONCLUSIONS:

THD is an effective technique and is associated with the best short-term clinical and surgical outcomes if compared with Ligasure.

PMID:
23140829
DOI:
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.01.014
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center