Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Neuroimage. 2013 Feb 1;66:270-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.056. Epub 2012 Oct 27.

Spatial smoothing systematically biases the localization of reward-related brain activity.

Author information

  • 1Neurosciences Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-2130, USA; Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2130, USA. Electronic address: msacchet@stanford.edu.
  • 2Neurosciences Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-2130, USA; Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2130, USA. Electronic address: knutson@psych.stanford.edu.

Abstract

Neuroimaging methods with enhanced spatial resolution such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) suggest that the subcortical striatum plays a critical role in human reward processing. Analysis of FMRI data requires several preprocessing steps, some of which entail tradeoffs. For instance, while spatial smoothing can enhance statistical power, it may also bias localization towards regions that contain more gray than white matter. In a meta-analysis and reanalysis of an existing dataset, we sought to determine whether spatial smoothing could systematically bias the spatial localization of foci related to reward anticipation in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc). An activation likelihood estimate (ALE) meta-analysis revealed that peak ventral striatal ALE foci for studies that used smaller spatial smoothing kernels (i.e. <6mm FWHM) were more anterior than those identified for studies that used larger kernels (i.e. >7mm FWHM). Additionally, subtraction analysis of findings for studies that used smaller versus larger smoothing kernels revealed a significant cluster of differential activity in the left relatively anterior NAcc (Talairach coordinates: -10, 9, -1). A second meta-analysis revealed that larger smoothing kernels were correlated with more posterior localizations of NAcc activation foci (p<0.015), but revealed no significant associations with other potentially relevant parameters (including voxel volume, magnet strength, and publication date). Finally, repeated analysis of a representative dataset processed at different smoothing kernels (i.e., 0-12mm) also indicated that smoothing systematically yielded more posterior activation foci in the NAcc (p<0.005). Taken together, these findings indicate that spatial smoothing can systematically bias the spatial localization of striatal activity. These findings have implications both for historical interpretation of past findings related to reward processing and for the analysis of future studies.

KEYWORDS:

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); Monetary incentive delay (MID) task; Nucleus accumbens (NAcc); Reward; Spatial smoothing; Ventral striatum (VS)

PMID:
23110886
PMCID:
PMC3618861
DOI:
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.056
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center