Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Eur Neurol. 2012;68(6):344-9. doi: 10.1159/000337677. Epub 2012 Oct 23.

Different pattern of clinical deficits in stroke mimics treated with intravenous thrombolysis.

Author information

1
Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. hakan.sarikaya@usz.ch

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Guidelines recommend intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) to be applied as early as possible in ischemic stroke (IS), while clinical presentation is often assessed by using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). However, diagnostic workup under time pressure bears the risk of misdiagnosis. Little is known about whether NIHSS could help to differentiate between IS and stroke mimics (SM) in patients being evaluated for IVT.

METHODS:

Prospectively collected data of 326 consecutive patients treated with IVT were analyzed. Baseline characteristics and NIHSS subscores were compared between SM and IS.

RESULTS:

Among 326 patients, 23 (7%) had a final diagnosis other than IS. Age and vascular risk factors were comparable in both groups. Patients with SM less often had oculomotor disturbance (0 vs. 37%, p < 0.001), dysarthria (9 vs. 51%, p < 0.001), hemineglect (0 vs. 30%, p < 0.01), hemianopia (0 vs. 22%, p < 0.01) and facial palsy (33 vs. 70%, p < 0.01). On the other hand, global aphasia without hemiparesis was more prevalent in SM patients (43 vs. 6%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

Our study suggests that patients with SM undergoing IVT present with a different pattern of clinical deficits than patients with IS.

PMID:
23095714
DOI:
10.1159/000337677
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for S. Karger AG, Basel, Switzerland
Loading ...
Support Center