Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1422-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2583-y. Epub 2012 Oct 24.

Ex vivo comparative study using the Endolifter® as a traction device for enhancing submucosal visualization during endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Author information

1
Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. anthonyteoh@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technically demanding procedure, and exposure of the submucosa depends on the action of gravity and submucosal injection. The aim of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of the Endolifter(®) as a traction device for enhancing submucosal visualization during ESD.

METHODS:

This was a prospective ex vivo comparative study conducted between September 2010 and March 2011 in the Prince of Wales Hospital. Consecutive ESDs were performed by four experienced endoscopists in an ex vivo ESD model with or without the Endolifter(®). The Endolifter(®) allows simultaneous grasping, retracting and lifting of the mucosa during ESD, resulting in exposure of the submucosa. Each of the procedures were recorded and reviewed later by two independent assessors. The outcome measures included the proportion of time that the submucosa was visualized during the procedures (SM ratio), procedural times, perforation rates, amount of submucosal injections, and the difficulty of the procedure.

RESULTS:

Forty-eight gastric ESD procedures were performed on the model. The SM ratio was higher in the Endolifter(®) group (P = 0.007), particularly for lesions located at the antrum (P < 0.001). The time required for submucosal dissection and the total procedural time were also less in the Endolifter(®) group. The endoscopists rated the ESD procedures in the Endolifter(®) group as less difficult (P = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS:

The Endolifter(®) improved submucosal visualization during gastric ESD and reduces the difficulty of performing the procedures. The device may improve the ease of performing ESD in low-volume centers or large mucosal lesions.

PMID:
23093235
DOI:
10.1007/s00464-012-2583-y
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer
    Loading ...
    Support Center