Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Community Ment Health J. 2013 Jun;49(3):331-7. doi: 10.1007/s10597-012-9546-6. Epub 2012 Oct 11.

Implementing the Strengths Model of case management: group supervision fidelity outcomes.

Author information

1
St Vincent's Mental Health Service, Hawthorn Community Mental Health Service, 642 Burwood Road, Hawthorn East, 3123, Australia. melissa.petrakis@svhm.org.au

Abstract

To evaluate group supervision implementation fidelity in the Strengths Model of case management within one adult mental health service. A fidelity audit was undertaken to analyse data across three service settings-residential and community-during the initial three months, utilising instruments developed by Rapp and Goscha (The Strengths Model: Case management with people with psychiatric disabilities, vol 2. Oxford University Press, New York, 2006). Very high fidelity for group supervision was achieved for group interaction (74.8%), client work (77%) and by case managers (90%). A standardised approach to group supervision process and documentation greatly supported fidelity in implementation. The Rapp and Goscha tools had utility as both learning aids and audit instruments.

PMID:
23054149
DOI:
10.1007/s10597-012-9546-6
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer
    Loading ...
    Support Center