Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2012 Oct;16(4):411-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jun 30.

Why reservations remain: a critical reflection about the systematic review and meta-analysis "Osteopathic manipulative treatment for low back pain" by Licciardone et al.

Author information

1
Institute for Osteopathic Studies, Siegen, Germany. info@helge-franke.de

Abstract

In 2005 John Licciardone, Angela Brimhall, and Linda King published a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with the title: Osteopathic manipulative treatment for low back pain. The conclusions of systematic review and meta-analysis depend highly on the right search strategy, the quality of the included studies (internal validity), and the error-free, unbiased and transparent evaluation of the review. As illustrated by the following article Licciardone's review includes elements that could lead to biased results. It is concluded that Licciardone et al. focused too much on the statistical significance, and overlooked that the problem of the review lay not in the calculations but in the quality and compilation of the studies.

PMID:
23036874
DOI:
10.1016/j.jbmt.2012.05.002
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center