Judgments about illegal performance-enhancing substances: reasoned, reactive, or both?

J Health Psychol. 2013 Jul;18(7):962-71. doi: 10.1177/1359105312445079. Epub 2012 Oct 1.

Abstract

This study applied aspects of the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Prototype/Willingness model to understand cognitions associated with the use of illegal performance-enhancing substances. There were two study objectives. One was to investigate whether the illegal-is-effective heuristic (i.e. belief that illegal performance-enhancing substances are more effective than legal performance-enhancing substances) affects willingness to use illegal performance-enhancing substances. The second was to examine whether attitudes, norms, and prototypes influence the willingness and intentions to use illegal performance-enhancing substances. The illegal-is-effective heuristic was a significant predictor of willingness but was not a significant predictor of intentions. Implications for future research and prevention efforts are discussed.

Keywords: dual-processing; intentions; performance-enhancing substances; prototypes; willingness.

MeSH terms

  • Athletes / psychology
  • Attitude to Health
  • Basketball / psychology
  • Basketball / statistics & numerical data
  • Doping in Sports / prevention & control
  • Doping in Sports / psychology
  • Doping in Sports / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Intention
  • Judgment
  • Legislation, Drug
  • Male
  • Performance-Enhancing Substances*
  • United States

Substances

  • Performance-Enhancing Substances