Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Feb;94(2):287-301. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.09.012. Epub 2012 Sep 26.

Systematic review of the clinimetric properties of laboratory- and field-based aerobic and anaerobic fitness measures in children with cerebral palsy.

Author information

1
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.balemans@vumc.nl

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To systematically evaluate the level of evidence of the clinimetric properties of measures of aerobic and anaerobic capacity used for children with cerebral palsy (CP).

DATA SOURCES:

A systematic search of databases PubMed, Embase, SPORTDiscus, and PsycINFO through April 2011 was performed.

STUDY SELECTION:

Two independent raters identified and examined studies that reported laboratory- or field-based measures of maximal aerobic or anaerobic capacity in children with CP aged 5 to 14 years.

DATA EXTRACTION:

The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was used by 2 independent raters to evaluate the methodologic quality of the included clinimetric studies and to identify measures used in these studies.

DATA SYNTHESIS:

Twenty-four studies that used a maximal aerobic or anaerobic capacity measure were identified. Five studies reported clinimetric properties for 5 measures (2 aerobic and 3 anaerobic measures). Methodologic quality was excellent in 3 studies, showing good validity and reliability of field-based aerobic (Shuttle Run Test) and anaerobic (Muscle Power Sprint Test) measures. The studies on laboratory-based measures were rated fair, mainly because of inadequate statistics. The level of evidence was strong for good validity and reliability of the field-based tests. The level of evidence was unknown for validity and low to moderate for good reliability of laboratory-based tests.

CONCLUSIONS:

There is a paucity of research on the clinimetric properties of measurement instruments to assess aerobic and anaerobic capacity for children with CP. Further clinimetric studies of laboratory-based measures in children with CP at all Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels, and clinimetric studies of field-based measures in children who are classified as GMFCS levels III to V are required.

PMID:
23022091
DOI:
10.1016/j.apmr.2012.09.012
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center