Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Clin Pathol. 2012 Oct;138(4):559-65.

Informed consent for blood transfusion: what do medicine residents tell? What do patients understand?

Author information

1
Departments of Pathology/Blood Bank, St Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY, USA.

Abstract

Blood transfusion is a common intervention in the hospital setting, and its benefits may not be clear but it has associated risks. Despite this, transfusion consent may not be obtained satisfactorily. We assessed transfusion consent effectiveness by comparing information given by residents with information understood by patients who receive transfusions. Medicine department residents who obtained consent were surveyed via telephone in conjunction with bedside surveys of adult inpatients who received transfusions. A total of 43 patient and 34 resident surveys were completed. Deficiencies in the transfusion consent process were noted. Discussed transfusion benefits (such as wound healing) were not always true benefits whereas some important risks (such as transfusion-related acute lung injury) were infrequently conferred. Risks were more often reported as "not discussed" than benefits. Only a few participants were aware of the hospital's Transfusion Health Guide, which provides information on transfusion benefits, risks, and alternatives.

PMID:
23010711
DOI:
10.1309/AJCP2TN5ODJLYGQR
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center