Send to

Choose Destination
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Feb;75(2):147-51.

A comparison of bed rest and immersion for treating the edema of pregnancy.

Author information

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.


Bed rest and immersion both lead to a mobilization of extravascular fluid and thus reduce edema. This study compared three treatments for edema in healthy pregnant women in the third trimester: lateral supine bed rest at room temperature, sitting in a bathtub of waist-deep water at 32 +/- 0.5C with legs horizontal, and sitting immersed in shoulder-deep water at 32 +/- 0.5C with legs extended downward. Post-treatment diuresis was selected as the indicator of extravascular fluid mobilization. The mean (+/- SD) diuresis was 105 +/- 48, 161 +/- 155, or 242 +/- 161 mL/hour for bed rest, bathtub, and immersion tank, respectively (P less than .008, tank versus bed rest; P less than .05, tank versus bath). In all treatments, mean arterial pressure (MAP) declined from a baseline value of 88 +/- 9 to 77 +/- 10 mmHg 25 minutes into treatment and 77 +/- 11 mmHg at 50 minutes (both P less than .0001 compared with pre-treatment). Shoulder-deep immersion produced the greatest decline in MAP. Sodium clearance increased from 0.7 to 1.0 mEq/minute in all treatments (P less than .01). Serum sodium, potassium, creatinine, osmolarity, total protein, 6-keto prostaglandin F1 alpha, and plasma volume did not change significantly after the treatments. Serum prolactin declined significantly from 137.8 +/- 44 to 124 +/- 31 ng/mL after treatment; there was no difference among treatments. Immersion appears to be a safe and more rapid method than bed rest to mobilize extravascular fluid during pregnancy.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center