Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Jan;9(1):55-62. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss099. Epub 2012 Sep 5.

The neural basis of belief updating and rational decision making.

Author information

1
Department of Economics Box 150, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany. carlos.alos-ferrer@uni-konstanz.de.

Abstract

Rational decision making under uncertainty requires forming beliefs that integrate prior and new information through Bayes' rule. Human decision makers typically deviate from Bayesian updating by either overweighting the prior (conservatism) or overweighting new information (e.g. the representativeness heuristic). We investigated these deviations through measurements of electrocortical activity in the human brain during incentivized probability-updating tasks and found evidence of extremely early commitment to boundedly rational heuristics. Participants who overweight new information display a lower sensibility to conflict detection, captured by an event-related potential (the N2) observed around 260 ms after the presentation of new information. Conservative decision makers (who overweight prior probabilities) make up their mind before new information is presented, as indicated by the lateralized readiness potential in the brain. That is, they do not inhibit the processing of new information but rather immediately rely on the prior for making a decision.

KEYWORDS:

Bayesian updating; LRP; N2; conservatism; representativeness heuristic

PMID:
22956673
PMCID:
PMC3871726
DOI:
10.1093/scan/nss099
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center