Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Jan;28(1):38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.015. Epub 2012 Sep 4.

Sexual selection in prehistoric animals: detection and implications.

Author information

1
School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. R.Knell@qmul.ac.uk

Abstract

Many fossil animals bear traits such as crests or horns that probably functioned as sexually selected signals or weapons. Interpretations of these structures as functioning in mate choice or intrasexual contests are often controversial, with interpretations based on biomechanics or physiology being favoured by many. Although testing hypotheses based on sexual selection can be difficult, especially given that there is no single, reliable means of recognising sexual selection, we argue that it is not impossible; indeed, there are now several cases where sexual selection is strongly supported. In other cases, a careful study of features such as sexual dimorphism, ontogeny, and allometry, coupled with testing of alternative hypotheses, will be necessary to distinguish between possible explanations for exaggerated features.

PMID:
22954658
DOI:
10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.015
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center