Send to

Choose Destination
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Jan;28(1):38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.015. Epub 2012 Sep 4.

Sexual selection in prehistoric animals: detection and implications.

Author information

School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.


Many fossil animals bear traits such as crests or horns that probably functioned as sexually selected signals or weapons. Interpretations of these structures as functioning in mate choice or intrasexual contests are often controversial, with interpretations based on biomechanics or physiology being favoured by many. Although testing hypotheses based on sexual selection can be difficult, especially given that there is no single, reliable means of recognising sexual selection, we argue that it is not impossible; indeed, there are now several cases where sexual selection is strongly supported. In other cases, a careful study of features such as sexual dimorphism, ontogeny, and allometry, coupled with testing of alternative hypotheses, will be necessary to distinguish between possible explanations for exaggerated features.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center