A. Msh2-Msh3 protection pattern on a 5’ flap substrate (Top) and nicked bubble substrate (Bottom) resulting from OP-Cu cleavage analysis (see , ). Circles: protection (<50% of no protein control), Triangles: enhanced cleavage (>150% of no protein control). B. Rad27 cleavage assay on substrates with various length -5’ flaps (5, 10, 20, and 30 nt). Substrates were incubated with Rad27 (2.5nM) and increasing concentrations of Msh2-Msh3 (0, 12.5 and 25nM). Top: substrate illustration with asterisk indicating site of 32P label. C. Msh2-Msh3 competes with Rad27 for binding at the base of a 5’ flap. Substrate binding efficiency was studies using electrophoresis mobility shift assay (EMSA). 10 and 20 nt flap substrates were pre-incubated with 2.5nM Rad27 for 10min before adding increasing concentrations of Msh2-Msh3 (0, 2.5, 12.5, 25, 37.5nM). The labeled substrate is illustrated above with the asterisk indicating the site of the 32P label. The complexes formed are indicated beside the gel, which correspond to the particular band shift. Bottom: illustration of Msh2-Msh3 inhibition of Rad27 cleavage. D. Ligation assay on substrates containing a 12nt unannealed bubble region separated from a nick by a various length annealed DNA regions (2, 4, 6nt). Substrates were incubated with Cdc9 (12.5nM) and increasing concentrations of Msh2-Msh3 (0, 2.5, 5, 12.5, 25, 37.5nM). Top: substrate illustration with asterisk indicating site of 32P label. Bottom: illustration of Msh2-Msh3 inhibition of Cdc9.