Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
ISRN Surg. 2012;2012:783932. doi: 10.5402/2012/783932. Epub 2012 Jul 31.

Mortality and survival rates after elective hepatic surgery in a low-volume centre are comparable to those of high-volume centres.

Author information

  • 1Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Northern Norway, University of Tromsø, 9038 Tromsø, Norway.

Abstract

Background. Over the last decades, liver resection has become a frequently performed procedure in western countries because of its acceptance as the most effective treatment for patients with selected cases of metastatic tumours. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results after hepatic resections performed electively in our centre since 1979 and compare the results to those of larger high-volume centres. Methods. Medical records of all patients who underwent liver resection from January 1979 to December 2011 were reviewed. Disease-free survival and overall survival were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Risk factors for complications were tested with the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazard model. Complications were classified according to the modified Clavien classification system. Results. 290 elective liver resections were performed between January 1979 and December 2011. There were 171 males (59.0%) and 119 females (41.0%). Median age was 63 years, range 1-87. Overall survival ranged from 0 to 383 months, with a median of 31 months. Five-year survival rate for patients who underwent liver resection for colorectal metastases was 35.8% (34/95). Discussion. Hepatic resections are safely performed at a low-volume centre, with regard to perioperative- and in-house mortality and 5-year survival rates.

PMID:
22900204
PMCID:
PMC3415082
DOI:
10.5402/2012/783932
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center