Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Curr Hypertens Rev. 2012 May;8(2):80-90.

Clinical Assessment of Central Blood Pressure.

Author information

1
Jichi Medical University Health Care Center, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan.

Abstract

Central aortic blood pressure (CBP) is increasingly considered a better cardiovascular prognostic marker than conventional cuff brachial blood pressure. Because CBP cannot be directly measured noninvasively, it has to be estimated from peripheral pressure pulses. To assess estimated CBP appropriately, the accuracy and features of the estimation method should be considered. The aim of this review is to provide basic knowledge and information useful for interpreting and assessing estimated CBP from a methodological point of view. Precise peripheral pressure pulse recording has been enabled by the introduction of arterial applanation tonometry, for which the radial artery may be the optimal site. An automated tonometry device utilizing a sensor array is preferable in terms of reproducibility and objectivity. Calibration of a peripheral pressure waveform has unresolved problems for any estimation method, due to imperfect brachial sphygmomanometry. However, if central and peripheral pressure calibrations are equivalent, two major methods to estimate CBP-those based on generalized pressure transfer function or radial late systolic pressure-may be comparable in their accuracy of CBP parameter estimation.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center