Format

Send to

Choose Destination
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040927. Epub 2012 Jul 17.

Faster, deeper, better: the impact of sniffing modulation on bulbar olfactory processing.

Author information

1
Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon (CRNL) Equipe Olfaction: du codage à la mémoire, CNRS UMR 5292-INSERM U1028-Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.

Abstract

A key feature of mammalian olfactory perception is that sensory input is intimately related to respiration. Different authors have considered respiratory dynamics not only as a simple vector for odor molecules but also as an integral part of olfactory perception. Thus, rats adapt their sniffing strategy, both in frequency and flow rate, when performing odor-related tasks. The question of how frequency and flow rate jointly impact the spatio-temporal representation of odor in the olfactory bulb (OB) has not yet been answered. In the present paper, we addressed this question using a simulated nasal airflow protocol on anesthetized rats combined with voltage-sensitive dye imaging (VSDi) of odor-evoked OB glomerular maps. Glomerular responses displayed a tonic component during odor stimulation with a superimposed phasic component phase-locked to the sampling pattern. We showed that a high sniffing frequency (10 Hz) retained the ability to shape OB activity and that the tonic and phasic components of the VSDi responses were dependent on flow rate and inspiration volume, respectively. Both sniffing parameters jointly affected OB responses to odor such that the reduced activity level induced by a frequency increase was compensated by an increased flow rate.

PMID:
22815871
PMCID:
PMC3398873
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0040927
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center