Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Skeletal Radiol. 2013 Feb;42(2):289-93. doi: 10.1007/s00256-012-1477-3. Epub 2012 Jun 28.

Value of DWI in visual assessment of activity of sacroiliitis in longstanding ankylosing spondylitis patients.

Author information

1
Department of Radiology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Gn.Tevfik Saglam Cad., 06018, Kecioren, Ankara, Turkey. tubasanal@gmail.com

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To test contrast to noise ratios (CNRs) of both diffusion-weighted (DW) images and contrast enhanced images in terms of the visual assessment of activity in sacroiliitis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

The study included 21 patients with AS. All patients were examined with STIR, FST1/Gd and DWI (b = 0,600). A total of 54 hyperintense lesions on STIR were noted in their sacroiliac joints divided into four quadrants. CNRs were calculated for all of the sequences above. A second group of patients (n = 7) with normal sacroiliac joints (SIJs) served as controls. A total of 56 CNR measurements from apparently normal subchondral bone marrow in this control group were done as well. The differences between scores were tested for significance (SPSS version 17.0) using Wilcoxon's test in which p values lower than 0.01 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS:

In the first group with sacroiliitis, mean CNRs for STIR, FST1/Gd, DWI were 32.97, 30.16 and 24.47, respectively. Mean CNRs in the second group with normal SIJs were calculated as 3.52 , 2.99 and 3.96, respectively . There was a statistically significant difference between the CNR measurements of the first and the second group (p = 0.000). Hyperintense lesions on STIR were depicted as "active" in the first group. Except for four lesions that were not included into the study, all of these hyperintense lesions were enhanced after contrast media administration. All of the "active" lesions were observed on DWI as well, at b = 600. No statistically significant difference between CNRs of contrast enhanced images and DWI and of contrast enhanced images and fluid sensitive sequences were found in the first group with sacroiliitis (p > 0.01).

CONCLUSION:

The CNRs are highest on STIR, followed by contrast enhanced images and DWIs. In terms of DWI and contrast enhanced images, there is no statistically significant difference between these two. Hence, contrast enhanced imaging can be replaced by DWI for visual analysis of active sacroiliitis, which is easy to apply without adverse affects of contrast media.

PMID:
22740078
DOI:
10.1007/s00256-012-1477-3
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer
    Loading ...
    Support Center