Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Jul;95(7):4065-73. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4874.

Different methods to calculate genomic predictions--comparisons of BLUP at the single nucleotide polymorphism level (SNP-BLUP), BLUP at the individual level (G-BLUP), and the one-step approach (H-BLUP).

Author information

1
MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Biotechnology and Food Research, Biometrical Genetics FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland. minna.koivula@mtt.fi

Abstract

Several strategies to use genomic data in predictions have been proposed. The aim of this study was to compare different genomic prediction methods. The response variables used in the genomic predictions were deregressed proofs, which were derived from 2 estimated breeding value (EBV) data sets. The full EBV data set from March 2010 included the EBV for production and mastitis traits for all Nordic red bulls. The reduced data set included the same animals as the full data set, but the EBV were predicted from a data set that excluded the last 5 yr of observations. Genomic predictions were obtained using different BLUP models: BLUP at the single nucleotide polymorphism level (SNP-BLUP), BLUP at the individual level (G-BLUP), and the one-step approach (H-BLUP). For the selection candidate bulls, the SNP-BLUP and G-BLUP models gave the same direct genomic breeding values (e.g., correlation of direct genomic breeding values between SNP-BLUP and G-BLUP for protein was 0.99), but slightly different from genomic EBV obtained from H-BLUP (correlations of SNP-BLUP or G-BLUP with H-BLUP were about 0.96). For all traits, SNP-BLUP and G-BLUP gave the same validation reliability, whereas H-BLUP led to slightly higher reliability. Therefore, the results support a slight advantage of using H-BLUP for genomic evaluation.

PMID:
22720963
DOI:
10.3168/jds.2011-4874
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center