Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Selected items

Items: 20

1.

Fat tissue measurements by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration of 3 different fan-beam instruments.

Malouf J, DiGregorio S, Del Rio L, Torres F, Marin AM, Farrerons J, Herrera S, Domingo P.

J Clin Densitom. 2013 Apr-Jun;16(2):212-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 Jun 13.

PMID:
22698632
2.

Pencil-beam vs fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry comparisons across four systems: body composition and bone mineral.

Soriano JM, Ioannidou E, Wang J, Thornton JC, Horlick MN, Gallagher D, Heymsfield SB, Pierson RN.

J Clin Densitom. 2004 Fall;7(3):281-9.

PMID:
15319498
4.

X-ray diffraction imaging with the Multiple Inverse Fan Beam topology: principles, performance and potential for security screening.

Harding G, Fleckenstein H, Kosciesza D, Olesinski S, Strecker H, Theedt T, Zienert G.

Appl Radiat Isot. 2012 Jul;70(7):1228-37. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.12.015. Epub 2011 Dec 23.

PMID:
22245364
5.
6.

Retraction: Pro-inflammatory cytokines induce odontogenic differentiation of dental pulp-derived stem cells. X Yang, S Zhang, X Pang, and M Fan.

[No authors listed]

J Cell Biochem. 2012 Aug;113(8):2796. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24283. No abstract available.

PMID:
22711476
7.

Comparison of pencil-, fan-, and cone-beam dual X-ray absorptiometers for evaluation of bone mineral content in excised rat bone.

Libouban H, Simon Y, Silve C, Legrand E, Baslé MF, Audran M, Chappard D.

J Clin Densitom. 2002 Winter;5(4):355-61.

PMID:
12665635
8.

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of inferior calcaneal enthesophytosis: outcome by fan-beam dual x ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Cosentino R, Frediani B, De Stefano R, Acciai C, Manca S, Selvi E, Frati E, Marcolongo R.

Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Dec;63(12):1704-5. No abstract available.

9.

Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans.

Blake GM, Parker JC, Buxton FM, Fogelman I.

Br J Radiol. 1993 Oct;66(790):902-6.

PMID:
8220974
11.
12.

Pencil-beam versus fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry comparisons across four systems: appendicular lean soft tissue.

Ioannidou E, Padilla J, Wang J, Heymsfield SB, Thornton JC, Horlick M, Gallagher D, Pierson RN Jr.

Acta Diabetol. 2003 Oct;40 Suppl 1:S83-5.

PMID:
14618441
13.

Differences between dual X-ray absorptiometry using pencil beam and fan beam modes and their determinants in vivo and in vitro.

Ruetsche AG, Lippuner K, Jaeger P, Casez JP.

J Clin Densitom. 2000 Summer;3(2):157-66.

PMID:
10871910
14.

Occupational dose to the radiographer in dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison of pencil-beam and fan-beam systems.

Patel R, Blake GM, Batchelor S, Fogelman I.

Br J Radiol. 1996 Jun;69(822):539-43.

PMID:
8757656
15.

Development and validation of MCNP4C-based Monte Carlo simulator for fan- and cone-beam x-ray CT.

Ay MR, Zaidi H.

Phys Med Biol. 2005 Oct 21;50(20):4863-85. Epub 2005 Oct 4.

PMID:
16204878
16.

Dual X-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration of a new fan-beam system.

Blake GM, Harrison EJ, Adams JE.

Calcif Tissue Int. 2004 Jul;75(1):7-14.

PMID:
15037973
17.

Measurement of bone density around total knee arthroplasty using fan-beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Soininvaara T, Kröger H, Jurvelin JS, Miettinen H, Suomalainen O, Alhava E.

Calcif Tissue Int. 2000 Sep;67(3):267-72.

PMID:
10954783
18.
19.

Body composition of neonates from fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement.

Hammami M, Koo WW, Hockman EM.

JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003 Nov-Dec;27(6):423-6.

PMID:
14621124
20.

The evaluation of consistency between body composition assessments in pediatric population using pencil beam and fan beam dual-energy x-ray absorptiometers.

Pludowski P, Jaworski M, Matusik H, Kobylinska M, Klimek P, Lorenc RS.

J Clin Densitom. 2010 Jan-Mar;13(1):84-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2009.11.001.

PMID:
20171570

Supplemental Content

Support Center