Recent studies have questioned the separability of the tight and roaming mechanisms to molecular decomposition. We explore this issue for a variety of reactions including MgH(2) → Mg + H(2), NCN → CNN, H(2)CO → H(2) + CO, CH(3)CHO → CH(4) + CO, and HNNOH → N(2) + H(2)O. Our analysis focuses on the role of second-order saddle points in defining global dividing surfaces that encompass both tight and roaming first-order saddle points. The second-order saddle points define an energetic criterion for separability of the two mechanisms. Furthermore, plots of the differential contribution to the reactive flux along paths connecting the first- and second-order saddle points provide a dynamic criterion for separability. The minimum in the differential reactive flux in the neighborhood of the second-order saddle point plays the role of a mechanism divider, with the presence of a strong minimum indicating that the roaming and tight mechanisms are dynamically distinct. We show that the mechanism divider is often, but not always, associated with a second-order saddle point. For the formaldehyde and acetaldehyde reactions, we find that the minimum energy geometry on a conical intersection is associated with the mechanism divider for the tight and roaming processes. For HNNOH, we again find that the roaming and tight processes are dynamically separable but we find no intrinsic feature of the potential energy surface associated with the mechanism divider. Overall, our calculations suggest that roaming and tight mechanisms are generally separable over broad ranges of energy covering most kinetically relevant regimes.