Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Virol Methods. 2012 Oct;185(1):32-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.05.023. Epub 2012 Jun 1.

The diagnostic performance of classical molecular tests used for detecting human papillomavirus.

Author information

1
Fundación Instituto de Inmunología de Colombia (FIDIC), Bogotá, Colombia. marina munoz@fidic.org.com

Abstract

Cervical samples were evaluated for human papillomavirus (HPV) presence using the hybrid capture-2 (HC2) assay and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with three different primer sets (GP5+/6+, MY09/11 and pU1M/2R). PCR results were compared to HC2 and results of all assays were compared to cytological and colposcopy findings. Post-test probability was assessed in individual assays and test combinations. HPV-DNA prevalence was 36.5% with HC2 and 55.2% with PCR. MY09/11 detected HPV-DNA in 38% of samples, GP5+/6+ in 19.1% and pU1M/2R in 16.4%. pU1M/2R and HC2 had the highest concordance (75.31%, k=0.39 in the whole population; 74.1%, k=0.5 in women with abnormal cytology). pU1M/2R had the best diagnostic performance, including optimal post-test probabilities and cervical abnormality detection (individually or in a panel of tests). Women positive for pU1M/2R may be at higher risk of disease progression; the assay performance when combined with a Pap smear in cervical cancer screening programs should be evaluated.

PMID:
22659023
DOI:
10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.05.023
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center