Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Infect Control. 2012 Dec;40(10):917-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.01.013. Epub 2012 May 24.

Assessing risk of health care-acquired Legionnaires' disease from environmental sampling: the limits of using a strict percent positivity approach.

Author information

1
Building Science & Forensics, Environmental Health & Engineering, Inc., Needham, MA, USA. jallen@eheinc.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Elevated percent positivity (≥30%) of Legionella in hospital domestic water systems has been suggested as a metric for assessing the risk of health care-acquired Legionnaires' disease (LD).

METHODS:

We examined the validity of this metric by analyzing data from peer-reviewed studies containing reports of Legionella prevalence in hospital water (ie, percent positivity) and temporally matched reports of patients with health care-acquired LD.

RESULTS:

Our literature review identified 31 peer-reviewed publications reporting matched data. We abstracted a total of 206 data points, representing 119 hospitals, from these articles. We determined that the proposed 30% positivity metric has 59% sensitivity and 74% specificity (ie, a 41% false-negative rate and a 26% false-positive rate). These notable error rates could have significant implications, given that we identified 16 peer-reviewed articles and 6 government guidance documents that referenced the 30% positivity metric as a risk assessment tool.

CONCLUSIONS:

Environmental sampling of hospital water distribution systems for Legionella can be an important component of risk management for LD. However, the possible consequence of using a percent positivity metric with low sensitivity and specificity is that many hospitals might fail to mitigate when a true risk is present, or might unnecessarily allocate limited resources to deal with a negligible risk.

PMID:
22633439
DOI:
10.1016/j.ajic.2012.01.013
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center