Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Dec;27(12):1714-20. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2068-7. Epub 2012 May 8.

Usability of FDA-approved medication guides.

Author information

1
Health Literacy and Learning Program, Division of General Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. mswolf@northwestern.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Medication guides are required documents to be distributed to patients in order to convey serious risks associated with certain prescribed medicines. Little is known about the effectiveness of this information to adequately inform patients on safe use.

OBJECTIVE:

To examine the readability, suitability, and comprehensibility of medication guides, particularly for those with limited literacy.

DESIGN:

Assessments of suitability and readability of 185 medication guides, and a sub-study examining change in suitability and readability from 2006 to 2010 among 32 of the medication guides (Study 1); 'open book' comprehension assessment of medication guides (Study 2).

SETTING:

Two general internal medicine clinics in Chicago, IL.

PATIENTS:

Four hundred and forty-nine adults seeking primary care services, ages 18-85.

MEASUREMENTS:

For Study 1, the Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM) and Lexile score for readability. For Study 2, a tailored comprehension assessment of content found in three representative medication guides.

RESULTS:

The 185 analyzed medication guides were on average 1923 words (SD = 1022), with a mean reading level of 10-11th grade. Only one medication guide was deemed suitable in SAM analyses. None provided summaries or reviews, or framed the context first, while very few were rated as having made the purpose evident (8 %), or limited the scope of content (22 %). For Study 2, participants' comprehension of medication guides was poor (M = 52.7 % correct responses, SD = 22.6). In multivariable analysis, low and marginal literacy were independently associated with poorer understanding (β = -14.3, 95 % CI -18.0 - -10.6, p < 0.001; low: β = -23.7, 95 % CI -28.3 - -19.0, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

Current medication guides are of little value to patients, as they are too complex and difficult to understand especially for individuals with limited literacy. Explicit guidance is offered for improving these print materials.

Comment in

PMID:
22566170
PMCID:
PMC3509312
DOI:
10.1007/s11606-012-2068-7
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center