Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Conscious Cogn. 2012 Sep;21(3):1419-34. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 Apr 21.

Genuine and drug-induced synesthesia: a comparison.

Author information

1
Laboratory for Synesthesia Research, Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Germany. christopher.sinke@gmail.com

Abstract

Despite some principal similarities, there is no systematic comparison between the different types of synesthesia (genuine, acquired and drug-induced). This comprehensive review compares the three principal types of synesthesia and focuses on their phenomenological features and their relation to different etiological models. Implications of this comparison for the validity of the different etiological models are discussed. Comparison of the three forms of synesthesia show many more differences than similarities. This is in contrast to their representation in the literature, where they are discussed in many respects as being virtually similar. Noteworthy is the much broader spectrum and intensity with the typical drug-induced synesthesias compared to genuine and acquired synesthesias. A major implication of the phenomenological comparison in regard to the etiological models is that genuine and acquired synesthesias point to morphological substrates, while drug-induced synesthesia appears to be based on functional changes of brain activity.

PMID:
22521474
DOI:
10.1016/j.concog.2012.03.009
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center