Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Jun;95(6):1385-95. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.023499. Epub 2012 Apr 18.

Nutritional support in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Author information

1
Institute of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The efficacy of nutritional support in the management of malnutrition in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is controversial. Previous meta-analyses, based on only cross-sectional analysis at the end of intervention trials, found no evidence of improved outcomes.

OBJECTIVE:

The objective was to conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to clarify the efficacy of nutritional support in improving intake, anthropometric measures, and grip strength in stable COPD.

DESIGN:

Literature databases were searched to identify RCTs comparing nutritional support with controls in stable COPD.

RESULTS:

Thirteen RCTs (n = 439) of nutritional support [dietary advice (1 RCT), oral nutritional supplements (ONS; 11 RCTs), and enteral tube feeding (1 RCT)] with a control comparison were identified. An analysis of the changes induced by nutritional support and those obtained only at the end of the intervention showed significantly greater increases in mean total protein and energy intakes with nutritional support of 14.8 g and 236 kcal daily. Meta-analyses also showed greater mean (±SE) improvements in favor of nutritional support for body weight (1.94 ± 0.26 kg, P < 0.001; 11 studies, n = 308) and grip strength (5.3%, P < 0.050; 4 studies, n = 156), which was not shown by ANOVA at the end of the intervention, largely because of bias associated with baseline imbalance between groups.

CONCLUSION:

This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that nutritional support, mainly in the form of ONS, improves total intake, anthropometric measures, and grip strength in COPD. These results contrast with the results of previous analyses that were based on only cross-sectional measures at the end of intervention trials.

PMID:
22513295
DOI:
10.3945/ajcn.111.023499
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center