Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Apr;31(4):760-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0329.

Direct-to-consumer Internet promotion of robotic prostatectomy exhibits varying quality of information.

Author information

1
State University of New York Downstate College of Medicine, Brooklyn, USA. joshua.mirkin@downstate.edu

Abstract

Robotic surgery to remove a cancerous prostate has become a popular treatment. Internet marketing of this surgery provides an intriguing case study of direct-to-consumer promotions of medical devices, which are more loosely regulated than pharmaceutical promotions. We investigated whether the claims made in online promotions of robotic prostatectomy were consistent with evidence from comparative effectiveness studies. After performing a search and cross-sectional analysis of websites that mentioned the procedure, we found that many sites claimed benefits that were unsupported by evidence and that 42 percent of the sites failed to mention risks. Most sites were published by hospitals and physicians, which the public may regard as more objective than pages published by manufacturers. Unbalanced information may inappropriately raise patients' expectations. Increasing enforcement and regulation of online promotions may be beyond the capabilities of federal authorities. Thus, the most feasible solution may be for the government and medical societies to promote the production of balanced educational material.

PMID:
22492893
PMCID:
PMC3897330
DOI:
10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0329
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center