Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Public Health Nutr. 2013 May;16(5):894-900. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012000961. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

A comparison of the cost of generic and branded food products in Australian supermarkets.

Author information

1
Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, Sydney, NSW 2011, Australia. kathyc@nswcc.org.au

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Food cost is an important factor influencing the consumption of nutritious foods and subsequent chronic disease risk. The present study compared the cost of branded food products with their generic equivalents across a range of food categories.

SETTING:

The survey was conducted within two major supermarket chains across six locations in Sydney, Australia (n 12).

DESIGN:

Price differences were calculated for 'core' (nutrient dense and low in energy) and 'extra' (high in undesirable nutrients and/or energy) packaged foods (n 22) between generic and branded items.

RESULTS:

A cost saving of 44 % was found by purchasing generic over branded products across all food categories. The most significant savings were for core foods, such as bread and cereals, and the smallest cost savings were seen for fruit products. There was little variation in cost saving between branded and generic products by socio-economic status of the supermarket location.

CONCLUSIONS:

The large price differential between branded and generic food products implies that consumers, particularly those on lower incomes, could benefit financially from purchasing generic items. The promotion of core generic products may be an effective strategy to assist people on lower incomes to meet dietary guidelines.

PMID:
22475494
DOI:
10.1017/S1368980012000961
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Cambridge University Press
    Loading ...
    Support Center