Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012 Jul;65(7):864-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.01.020. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

Pharyngeal flap versus sphincter pharyngoplasty for the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency: a meta-analysis.

Author information

1
Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) has been reported in 5-20% of patients following cleft palate repair. Since VPI can limit communication, determining which operative procedure leads to the greatest improvement is of utmost importance. Since there is no consensus, this meta-analysis aims to determine which procedure results in the most significant resolution of VPI.

METHODS:

Two independent assessors undertook a literature review for articles that compare procedures aimed at treating VPI. Study quality was determined using validated scales. Level of agreement was assessed using intra-class coalition coefficient analysis. The heterogeneity between studies was evaluated using I(2) and Cochran's Q-statistic. Random effect model analysis and forest plots were used to report a pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for treatment effect. A p-value of 0.05 was considered for statistical significance.

RESULTS:

Two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pharyngeal flap to sphincter pharyngoplasty were obtained. A total of 133 patients were included, with follow-ups at 3-4 months. The pooled OR was determined to be 2.95 (95% CI: 0.66-13.23) in favour of the pharyngeal flap.

CONCLUSIONS:

Based on these RCTs, which currently compose the highest quality data that compares pharyngeal flap versus pharyngoplasty, the pooled treatment effect suggests a possible trend favouring pharyngeal flap.

PMID:
22459796
DOI:
10.1016/j.bjps.2012.01.020
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center