Purpose: The treatment of early-stage colorectal cancers removed endoscopically depends on histopathologic findings. This study aimed to assess the benefit-risk balance for patients who underwent additional surgery after endoscopic resection of a T1 carcinoma with unfavorable histology.
Methods: From 2000 to 2010, 64 consecutive patients were included in this retrospective study. Specimens resected after endoscopic polypectomy showed at least one of the following unfavorable factors: no free margin, lymphovascular invasion, poorly differentiated grade, SM2-3 involvement (submucosal invasion greater than 300 μm from the muscularis mucosae), tumor budding, sessile morphology, and piecemeal resection. The main objective was to assess the benefit-risk balance of an oncological resection performed after the polypectomy. Oncological benefit was measured by the lymph node metastasis rate and the persistence of a residual adenocarcinoma on the specimen. The risk was measured by the occurrence of severe complications of grade III-IV or death. The associations between these end points and clinicopathologic variables were evaluated by univariate analysis and logistic regression.
Results: Five patients (7.8 %) had lymph node metastases and two (3.1 %) had residual carcinomas. Eight patients (12.5 %) had grade III-IV morbidity. There were no deaths. Oncological benefit was associated by logistic regression analysis with patients who presented multiple criteria (≥2) that led to surgery (p = 0.031). The benefit-risk balance was favorable only for those patients.
Conclusions: Additional surgery is required for patients who present multiple adverse histological criteria. If only one criterion is selected, the indication should be discussed, especially for patients with multiple comorbidities.