Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Skull Base. 2011 Jan;21(1):37-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1263285.

Evaluation of the prognostic indicators of giant intracranial aneurysms.

Abstract

The indicators of poor outcome in giant intracranial aneurysms have been the subject of several studies in the literature. We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the predictors of poor outcome in giant intracranial aneurysms. We studied consecutive cases with aneurysms admitted over a 9-year period in our institution. All the aneurysms were treated with clipping. Patient demographics, clinical profile, and aneurysm characteristics were evaluated in a multivariate analysis as probable indicators of Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score. The outcome of the aneurysms (GOS score) was compared with the remaining non-giant aneurysms. A total of 41 giant and 348 non-giant aneurysms were identified in our series. In the multivariate analysis, the indicators of poor outcome were identified as poor clinical grade (p < 0.0004), intraoperative rupture (p < 0.007), and posterior circulation of the aneurysms (p < 0.01). Non-giant aneurysms had a better outcome compared with the giant aneurysms (p < 0.01). Giant aneurysms impose a relatively higher risk of morbidity and mortality to the patients. The predictors of the postsurgical outcome of the giant aneurysms include the clinical condition of the patient, location of the aneurysm, and intraoperative rupture.

KEYWORDS:

Aneurysms; clipping; giant; intracranial; prognosis

PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center