Send to

Choose Destination
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 May;54(9):1240-8. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis200. Epub 2012 Mar 19.

Performance of Candida real-time polymerase chain reaction, β-D-glucan assay, and blood cultures in the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis.

Author information

Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, USA.



The sensitivity of blood cultures for diagnosing invasive candidiasis (IC) is poor.


We performed a validated Candida real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the Fungitell 1,3-β-D-glucan (BDG) assay on blood samples collected from prospectively identified patients with IC (n = 55) and hospitalized controls (n = 73). Patients with IC had candidemia (n = 17), deep-seated candidiasis (n = 33), or both (n = 5). Controls had mucosal candidiasis (n = 5), Candida colonization (n = 48), or no known Candida colonization (n = 20).


PCR using plasma or sera was more sensitive than whole blood for diagnosing IC (P = .008). Plasma or sera PCR was more sensitive than BDG in diagnosing IC (80% vs 56%; P = .03), with comparable specificity (70% vs 73%; P = .31). The tests were similar in diagnosing candidemia (59% vs 68%; P = .77), but PCR was more sensitive for deep-seated candidiasis (89% vs 53%; P = .004). PCR and BDG were more sensitive than blood cultures among patients with deep-seated candidiasis (88% and 62% vs 17%; P = .0005 and .003, respectively). PCR and culture identified the same Candida species in 82% of patients. The sensitivity of blood cultures combined with PCR or BDG among patients with IC was 98% and 79%, respectively.


Candida PCR and, to a lesser extent, BDG testing significantly enhanced the ability of blood cultures to diagnose IC.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center