Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Endod. 2012 Apr;38(4):442-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.009. Epub 2012 Jan 9.

Success rates for removing or bypassing fractured instruments: a prospective clinical study.

Author information

1
Graduate Program in Endodontics, São Leopoldo Mandic Dental Research Center, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. gnevares@yahoo.com

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

The objective of this study was to evaluate the success rates of standardized techniques for removing or bypassing fractured instruments from root canals and determine whether visualization of the fractured instrument with the aid of an operating microscope has any impact on the success rates.

METHODS:

In this prospective study, attempts were made to visualize 112 fractured instruments under a dental operating microscope after creating a straight-line access to the fragment. By using ultrasonic tips alone or associated with bypassing, the Ruddle technique was attempted to remove the 68 visible instruments. Bypassing was performed for the 44 nonvisible fragments. The χ(2) test was performed to assess whether any significant difference occurred between the success rates observed for the visible and nonvisible fractured instrument groups.

RESULTS:

The overall success rate (removal and bypassing) was 70.5% (n = 79). In the visible fragment group, the success rate was 85.3% (n = 58), and in the nonvisible fragment group it was 47.7% (n = 21). Success rates were significantly higher when the fragment was visible (P = .0009).

CONCLUSIONS:

The standardized techniques used in this study for removing or bypassing fractured instruments were effective, and approximately 2 times greater success rate was obtained when the fragment was visible inside the root canal compared with when it was nonvisible.

PMID:
22414826
DOI:
10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.009
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center