Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Public Underst Sci. 2011 Nov;20(6):796-809.

Truth and opinion in climate change discourse: the Gore-Hansen disagreement.

Author information

1
School of Journalism and Communication, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. chris.russill@gmail.com

Abstract

In this paper, I discuss the "inconvenient truth" strategy of Al Gore. I argue that Gore's notion of truth upholds a conception of science and policy that narrows our understanding of climate change discourse. In one notable exchange, Gore and NASA scientist, James Hansen, disagreed about whether scientific statements based on Hansen's computer simulations were truth or opinion. This exchange is featured in An Inconvenient Truth, yet the disagreement is edited from the film and presented simply as an instance of Hansen speaking "inconvenient truth". In this article, I compare the filmic representation of Hansen's testimony with the congressional record. I place their exchange in a broader historical perspective on climate change disputation in order to discuss the implications of Gore's perspective on truth.

PMID:
22397086
DOI:
10.1177/0963662510364201
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Atypon
    Loading ...
    Support Center