Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Bioorg Med Chem. 2012 Mar 15;20(6):2082-90. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2012.01.035. Epub 2012 Jan 31.

Might the observed α(2A)-adrenoreceptor agonism or antagonism of allyphenyline analogues be ascribed to different molecular conformations?

Author information

1
Scuola di Scienze del Farmaco e dei Prodotti della Salute, Università degli Studi di Camerino, via S. Agostino 1, 62032 Camerino, Italy.

Abstract

We recently reported that the α(2)-adrenoreceptor (AR) ligand allyphenyline (9) significantly enhanced morphine analgesia (due to its α(2C)-AR agonism), was devoid of sedative side effects (due to its α(2A)-AR antagonism), prevented and reversed morphine tolerance and dependence. To highlight the molecular characteristics compatible with this behaviour and to obtain novel agents potentially useful in chronic pain and opioid addiction management, the allyl group of 9 was replaced by substituents of moderate steric bulk (MR) and positive or negative lipophilic (π) and electronic (σ) contributions in all the possible combinations. Effective novel α(2C)-agonists/α(2A)-antagonists (2, 3, 10, 12, and 17) were obtained. This study also demonstrated that contradictory combinations of the physicochemical parameters were similarly able to induce the α(2A)-activation. Since we had previously observed that the absolute configuration affected only the potency, but not the functional profile of the ligands, we hypothesized that the α(2A)-activation was governed by a ligand preferred conformation. From a structural overlay investigation it emerged that an extended conformation appeared to be associated with dual α(2C)-agonism/α(2A)-antagonism, whereas a folded conformation associated with α(2C)-/α(2A)-agonism.

PMID:
22341244
DOI:
10.1016/j.bmc.2012.01.035
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center