Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):191-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318244e6b5.

The effect of improving processes of care on patient outcomes: evidence from the United Kingdom's quality and outcomes framework.

Author information

1
Public Health Department, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. amr2015@med.cornell.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Despite the extensive use of process of care measures in pay-for-performance programs, little is known about the effect of improving process performance on patient outcomes.

METHODS:

Retrospective longitudinal analysis of data extracted from 7228 family practices in the United Kingdom's Quality and Outcomes Framework pay-for-performance program. We estimated the proportion of the change in outcome performance over time which was attributable to change in process performance for 5 chronic conditions (diabetes, coronary heart disease, stroke, epilepsy, and hypertension). Our analytic strategy accounted for bias resulting from unmeasured processes of care and severity of illness.

RESULTS:

The estimated improvement in composite outcomes that was attributable to improved process was 29.6% for diabetes, 25.6% for coronary heart disease, 34.7% for stroke, 29.1% for epilepsy, and 17.7% for hypertension. The relationship between processes and outcomes varied little across patient and practice characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS:

Improvement in process performance in English family practices led to improvements in patient outcomes. Although the effect was modest at the practice-level, process improvements seem to have led to substantial improvements in population health.

PMID:
22329994
DOI:
10.1097/MLR.0b013e318244e6b5
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center