Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Dermatol Surg. 2012 Feb;38(2 Spec No.):309-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02248.x.

Validated assessment scales for the upper face.

Author information

1
Department of Dermatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA. flynn@caryskincenter.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Age-related upper face changes such as wrinkles, lines, volume loss, and anatomic alterations may affect quality of life and psychological well-being. The development of globally accepted tools to assess these changes objectively is an essential contribution to aesthetic research and routine clinical medicine.

OBJECTIVE:

To establish the reliability of several upper face scales for clinical research and practice: forehead lines, glabellar lines, crow's feet (at rest and dynamic expression), sex-specific brow positioning, and summary scores of forehead and crow's feet areas and of the entire upper face unit.

METHODS AND MATERIALS:

Four 5-point photonumerical rating scales were developed to assess glabellar lines and sex-specific brow positioning. Twelve experts rated identical upper face photographs of 50 subjects in two separate rating cycles using all eight scales. Responses of raters were analyzed to assess intra- and interrater reliability.

RESULTS:

Interrater reliability was substantial for all upper face scales, aesthetic areas, and the upper face score except for the brow positioning scales. Intrarater reliability was high for all scales and resulting scores.

CONCLUSION:

Except for brow positioning, the upper face rating scales are reliable tools for valid and reproducible assessment of the aging process.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center