Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Front Genet. 2011 Jun 15;2:31. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2011.00031. eCollection 2011.

Cost-effective prediction of gender-labeling errors and estimation of gender-labeling error rates in candidate-gene association studies.

Author information

1
Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Simon Fraser University Burnaby, BC, Canada.

Abstract

We describe a statistical approach to predict gender-labeling errors in candidate-gene association studies, when Y-chromosome markers have not been included in the genotyping set. The approach adds value to methods that consider only the heterozygosity of X-chromosome SNPs, by incorporating available information about the intensity of X-chromosome SNPs in candidate genes relative to autosomal SNPs from the same individual. To our knowledge, no published methods formalize a framework in which heterozygosity and relative intensity are simultaneously taken into account. Our method offers the advantage that, in the genotyping set, no additional space is required beyond that already assigned to X-chromosome SNPs in the candidate genes. We also show how the predictions can be used in a two-phase sampling design to estimate the gender-labeling error rates for an entire study, at a fraction of the cost of a conventional design.

KEYWORDS:

X-chromosome SNPs; candidate-gene association study; error rates; gender-labeling errors; genotype intensities; heterozygosity; quality control; two-phase sampling design

PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Frontiers Media SA Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center