Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
AACN Adv Crit Care. 2012 Jan-Mar;23(1):32-42. doi: 10.1097/NCI.0b013e318240e2f9.

Evaluating a new rapid response team: NP-led versus intensivist-led comparisons.

Author information

1
Misericordia Hospital, 2E-83 16940-87th Ave, Edmonton, AB, Canada. kim.scherr@covenanthealth.ca

Abstract

Evidence is needed to validate rapid response teams (RRTs), including those led by nurse practitioners (NPs). A descriptive-comparative mixed-methods study was undertaken to evaluate a newly implemented NP-led RRT at 2 Canadian hospitals. On the basis of data gathered on 255 patients who received an RRT call compared with the patient data for the previous year, no significant differences in the number of cardiorespiratory arrests, unplanned intensive care unit admissions, and hospital mortality were found. In addition, no significant differences in patient outcomes were identified between the NP-led and intensivist physician-led RRT calls. A paper survey revealed that ward nurses had confidence in the knowledge and skills of the NP-led RRT and believed that patient outcomes were improved as a result of their RRT call. These findings indicate that NP-led RRTs are a safe and effective alternative to intensivist-led teams, but more research is needed to demonstrate that RRTs improve hospital care quality and patient outcomes.

PMID:
22290088
DOI:
10.1097/NCI.0b013e318240e2f9
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Support Center