Use of patient-reported outcomes in the context of different levels of data

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):66-71. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01021.

Abstract

There is increasing interest in measuring patient-reported outcomes as part of routine medical practice, particularly in fields like total joint replacement surgery, where pain relief, satisfaction, function, and health-related quality of life, as perceived by the patient, are primary outcomes. We review some well-known outcome instruments, measurement issues, and early experiences with large-scale collection of patient-reported outcome measures in joint registries. The patient-reported outcome measures are reviewed in the context of multidimensional outcome assessment that includes the traditional clinical outcome parameters as well as disease-specific and general patient-reported outcome measures.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Arthroplasty, Replacement*
  • Australasia
  • Europe
  • Humans
  • North America
  • Patient Satisfaction* / statistics & numerical data
  • Product Surveillance, Postmarketing / methods*
  • Product Surveillance, Postmarketing / statistics & numerical data
  • Quality of Life*
  • Registries / statistics & numerical data*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Treatment Outcome