Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):953-61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.012. Epub 2012 Jan 8.

Dynamic models of BOLD contrast.

Author information

1
Department of Radiology, Center for Functional MRI, and Kavli Institute for Brain and Mind, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, CA 92093-0677, USA. rbuxton@ucsd.edu

Abstract

This personal recollection looks at the evolution of ideas about the dynamics of the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal, with an emphasis on the balloon model. From the first detection of the BOLD response it has been clear that the signal exhibits interesting dynamics, such as a pronounced and long-lasting post-stimulus undershoot. The BOLD response, reflecting a change in local deoxyhemoglobin, is a combination of a hemodynamic response, related to changes in blood flow and venous blood volume, and a metabolic response related to oxygen metabolism. Modeling is potentially a way to understand the complex path from changes in neural activity to the BOLD signal. In the early days of fMRI it was hoped that the hemodynamic/metabolic response could be modeled in a unitary way, with blood flow, oxygen metabolism, and venous blood volume-the physiological factors that affect local deoxyhemoglobin-all tightly linked. The balloon model was an attempt to do this, based on the physiological ideas of limited oxygen delivery at baseline and a slow recovery of venous blood volume after the stimulus (the balloon effect), and this simple model of the physiology worked well to simulate the BOLD response. However, subsequent experiments suggest a more complicated picture of the underlying physiology, with blood flow and oxygen metabolism driven in parallel, possibly by different aspects of neural activity. In addition, it is still not clear whether the post-stimulus undershoot is a hemodynamic or a metabolic phenomenon, although the original venous balloon effect is unlikely to be the full explanation, and a flow undershoot is likely to be important. Although our understanding of the physics of the BOLD response is now reasonably solid, our understanding of the underlying physiological relationships is still relatively poor, and this is the primary hurdle for future models of BOLD dynamics.

PMID:
22245339
PMCID:
PMC3545646
DOI:
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.012
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center