Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Jan;94(1):80-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B1.26004.

Revision of total elbow replacement by exchange cementing.

Author information

1
University of Otago, Department of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2 Riccarton Avenue, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.

Abstract

We report the effectiveness of revision of total elbow replacement by re-cementing. Between 1982 and 2004, 53 elbows in 52 patients were treated with re-cementing of a total elbow replacement into part or all of the existing cement mantle or into the debrided host-bone interface, without the use of structural bone augmentation or a custom prosthesis. The original implant revision was still in situ and functional in 42 of 53 elbows (79%) at a mean of 94.5 months (26 to 266) after surgery. In 31 of these 42 elbows (74%) the Mayo Elbow Performance Score was good or excellent. Overall, of the 53 elbows, 18 (34%) required re-operation, ten (19%) for loosening. A classification system was developed to identify those not suitable for revision by this technique, and using this we have showed that successful re-implantation is statistically correlated to properly addressing the bone deficiency for both the humeral (p = 0.005) and the ulnar (p = 0.039) components.

PMID:
22219252
DOI:
10.1302/0301-620X.94B1.26004
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Support Center