Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2012 Jan 1;17:1345-61.

LINEs, SINEs and other retroelements: do birds of a feather flock together?

Author information

1
Tulane University, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane Cancer Center, SL-66 1430 Tulane Ave., New Orleans, LA 70112. aengel@tulane.edu

Abstract

Mobile elements account for almost half of the mass of the human genome. Only the retroelements from the non-LTR (long terminal repeat) retrotransposon family, which include the LINE-1 (L1) and its non-autonomous partners, are currently active and contributing to new insertions. Although these elements seem to share the same basic amplification mechanism, the activity and success of the different types of retroelements varies. For example, Alu-induced mutagenesis is responsible for the majority of the documented instances of human disease induced by insertion of retroelements. Using copy number in mammals as an indicator, some SINEs have been vastly more successful than other retroelements, such as the retropseudogenes and even L1, likely due to differences in post-insertion selection and ability to overcome cellular controls. SINE and LINE integration can be differentially influenced by cellular factors, indicating some differences between in their amplification mechanisms. We focus on the known aspects of this group of retroelements and highlight their similarities and differences that may significantly influence their biological impact.

PMID:
22201808
PMCID:
PMC3364521
DOI:
10.2741/3991
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Frontiers in Bioscience Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center