Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Feb;32(1):65-8. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31823f3b47.

Comparison of academic and nonacademic sites in multi-center clinical trials.

Author information

1
Depression Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. cdording@partners.org

Abstract

The selection of appropriate subjects is a critical element of successful clinical trials. Failure to properly identify, select, and retain subjects in clinical trials of antidepressant medications may affect the ability to show separation from placebo. Little is known about which type of site, academic or nonacademic, is superior in selecting and retaining appropriate subjects. In the present investigation, the authors conducted a retrospective analysis comparing the performance of academic and nonacademic sites in selecting and retaining appropriate subjects in a recently completed multi-site clinical study of aripiprazole augmentation. The authors used a set of operationalized criteria called the SAFER to identify appropriate study subjects. No significant differences were found in rates of SAFER interview passing, study completion, and clinical outcomes between academic and nonacademic sites. Our findings suggest that academic and nonacademic sites are equally effective in their ability to identify and retain appropriate study participants.

PMID:
22198440
DOI:
10.1097/JCP.0b013e31823f3b47
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center