Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Dec 14;12:473. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-473.

Estimation of bacterial diversity using next generation sequencing of 16S rDNA: a comparison of different workflows.

Author information

1
Centro Nacional de BiotecnologĂ­a, c/Darwin 3, 28049 Madrid, Spain.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Next generation sequencing (NGS) enables a more comprehensive analysis of bacterial diversity from complex environmental samples. NGS data can be analysed using a variety of workflows. We test several simple and complex workflows, including frequently used as well as recently published tools, and report on their respective accuracy and efficiency under various conditions covering different sequence lengths, number of sequences and real world experimental data from rhizobacterial populations of glyphosate-tolerant maize treated or untreated with two different herbicides representative of differential diversity studies.

RESULTS:

Alignment and distance calculations affect OTU estimations, and multiple sequence alignment exerts a major impact on the computational time needed. Generally speaking, most of the analyses produced consistent results that may be used to assess differential diversity changes, however, dataset characteristics dictate which workflow should be preferred in each case.

CONCLUSIONS:

When estimating bacterial diversity, ESPRIT as well as the web-based workflow, RDP pyrosequencing pipeline, produced good results in all circumstances, however, its computational requirements can make method-combination workflows more attractive, depending on sequence variability, number and length.

PMID:
22168258
PMCID:
PMC3258296
DOI:
10.1186/1471-2105-12-473
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center