An objective comparison of leakage between commonly used earplugs

Am J Otolaryngol. 2012 Jul-Aug;33(4):469-72. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2011.10.023. Epub 2011 Dec 9.

Abstract

Objective: We sought to determine the efficacy of commonly used earplugs using an anatomically correct ear model.

Methods: The total volume and rate of water that leaked past the earplug and subsequent defect in the tympanic membrane over separately measured 30, 60, 120, and 180-second intervals were recorded. Scenarios tested included a control with no earplug, custom molded earplug (Precision Laboratories, Orlando, FL), Mack's plug (Warren, MI), Doc's plug (Santa Cruz, CA), and cotton balls coated with petroleum jelly.

Results: All plugs tested resulted in less leakage at all time points when compared with no plug (P < .05). At 30 seconds, the custom molded, Mack's and Doc's plugs all showed significantly less leakage when compared with the cotton ball coated with petroleum jelly (P < .05). At 60, 120, and 180 seconds, Mack's, Doc's, and the cotton plugs all showed significantly less leakage compared with the customized plug (P < .05). At 120 and 180 seconds, Mack's plugs had significant less leakage than the cotton plug (P < .05). Among the types of plugs, the molded variety (Mack's) showed the least volume and lowest leakage rate (f(4,45) = 94 [P < .001]). In addition, Doc's and cotton balls coated with petroleum jelly were more effective than the customized earplugs.

Conclusions: If the clinician feels that middle ear and external canal water exposure should be minimized, then use of earplugs, particularly the moldable variety, merits further consideration.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Analysis of Variance
  • Cotton Fiber
  • Ear Canal
  • Ear Protective Devices*
  • Equipment Design
  • Equipment Failure
  • Humans
  • Models, Anatomic
  • Petrolatum
  • Water

Substances

  • Water
  • Petrolatum