Claiming space for an engaged anthropology: spatial inequality and social exclusion

Am Anthropol. 2011;113(3):389-407. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1433.2011.01349.x.

Abstract

I use the concept of “engaged anthropology” to frame a discussion of how “spatializing culture” uncovers systems of exclusion that are hidden or naturalized and thus rendered invisible to other methodological approaches. “Claiming Space for an Engaged Anthropology” is doubly meant: to claim more intellectual and professional space for engagement and to propose that anthropology include the dimension of space as a theoretical construct. I draw on three fieldwork examples to illustrate the value of the approach: (1) a Spanish American plaza, reclaimed from a Eurocentric past, for indigenous groups and contemporary cultural interpretation; (2) Moore Street Market, an enclosed Latino food market in Brooklyn, New York, reclaimed for a translocal set of social relations rather than a gentrified redevelopment project; (3) gated communities in Texas and New York and cooperatives in New York, reclaiming public space and confronting race and class segregation created by neoliberal enclosure and securitization.

Publication types

  • Historical Article

MeSH terms

  • Acculturation / history
  • Anthropology* / education
  • Anthropology* / history
  • Cultural Diversity*
  • Ethnicity* / education
  • Ethnicity* / ethnology
  • Ethnicity* / history
  • History, 20th Century
  • History, 21st Century
  • Humans
  • Public Facilities* / history
  • Race Relations / history
  • Race Relations / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Race Relations / psychology
  • Social Alienation* / psychology
  • Social Behavior* / history
  • Social Change / history
  • Spatial Behavior